Clarification of my last post
However, even though the latest Zionist strategy is to tie the Palestinians in with the Nazis, factually the Palestinians had nothing to do with them. Palestine was ruled for centuries by the Ottomans and then in came the British with their usual colonial disasterous policies. Why and how the Palestinians came to bear the brunt for actions not attributable to them defies logic.
Palestinian people lived together for centuries with little or no problems that can be tied to religion. Jews, Muslims, and Christians managed to live together, next to each in fact, without animosity. If Muslims hated Jews to the degree the current myth goes, why were any left after 600+ years of Muslim rule?
The West came in via the UN and displaced the population. Palestinian Muslims went from living on 70-80% of the land to 50%. Isn't that usually called theft? Read yourself about the Zionist doctrine and how anti-semitic it has always been. Read more about how the "European" Jews discriminate against Jews from North Africa. The myth continues about how the Zionists against heavy odds fought and won more land. Who do you think financed the Zionists, who do you think bought weapons from the British government to supply the Zionists after WWII, who do you think controls most all the central government banks in the world? Hint: the family also makes very good wine weven when they serve as presidents of Zionism.
So, if you've got a problem with these two posts, I suggest you stop allowing yourself to believe in the propanganda you've bought into. Like the 1967 War was to save Israel. It wasn't and you can easily find quotes from Moshe Dayan and others saying it wasn't. What's so valiant about launching a premeditated, secret attack with a far superior military force?